UPS Looking at Bailout Impact

Extending TARP to trucking industry raises questions

Transportation giant UPS said it’s studying the issue of federal bailouts for financially ailing trucking companies but wouldn’t comment directly on competitor YRC Worldwide’s request for $1 billion in federal aid.

“The bottom line is, we don’t comment on the financial difficulties of our competitors,” said UPS spokesman Norman Black. On whether the treasury department program which has so far has sent money to the banking, automobile and insurance industries should be extended to the trucking industry, “we’re still looking at that,” Black said.

UPS paid $6.1 billion to unshackle itself from its own pension liability in 2007. Industry observers said at the time that allowing UPS to exit the pension plan, which covered 240,000 union parcel workers, was part of a quid pro quo with the Teamsters that gave the union an unhindered path toward organizing UPS Freight, the company’s less-than-truckload subsidiary, through a terminal-by-terminal card check agreement.

One Wall Street analyst wondered, “If YRC is allowed to get $1 billion from TARP, is UPS allowed to get a $5.1 billion refund?”

YRC to Apply for Bailout Funds

Amid Pension Pressure, Trucking Company Plans to Request $1 Billion in U.S. Aid

YRC Worldwide Inc., one of the nation's largest trucking companies, will seek $1 billion in federal bailout money to help relieve pension obligations, the chief executive said Thursday.

The move comes as the trucking giant struggles to shore up its finances. The company's ability to weather the recession will have significant implications for the trucking industry and large customers across the country.

Chief Executive William Zollars said the company will seek the money to help cover the cost of its estimated $2 billion pension obligation over the next four years. Under a complicated system that Mr. Zollars labeled unfair, roughly half of YRC's contributions to a multi-employer union pension fund cover the costs of retirees who never worked for the Overland Park, Kan., company.

By applying to the U.S. Treasury for money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program, Mr. Zollars said he hopes to "get the conversation started" with federal authorities about reducing the company's pension obligations. He said YRC will submit an application to the Treasury Department as early as Friday.

Experts say the company's odds of actually getting TARP money appear to be slim. A Treasury spokesman didn't return a call seeking comment.

"My experience dealing with Treasury is that with TARP funds they are relatively narrow in how they view things," said Frank Bonaventure Jr., a lawyer who has represented banking clients seeking these funds. "They have not been very expansive in terms of how it is applied and what industries could get it."

The move comes at a time when YRC is taking steps to cut costs and raise cash. With $1.5 billion in revenue for its most recent quarter, YRC owns at least 20% of the national market share in the less-than-truckload industry, in which trucking companies combine multiple customers' loads into a single truck.

Last month, YRC reported a $415 million first-quarter loss, with a 30% drop in freight tonnage. Some customers fled amid fears about the company's financial health and its ability to smoothly merge its separate Yellow and Roadway brands. YRC has been working on the integration for several months.

The company recently negotiated a 10% wage cut for its 35,000 Teamster employees and requested to put up some of its property as collateral in order to defer three months' worth of payments to its pension plan. It also notified investors that it might violate the terms of its bank covenant, although Mr. Zollars said Thursday that YRC "continues to work closely with our bank group and would expect no issues around the second-quarter covenant."

One potential outcome that the company could seek is for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. to take over financial responsibility for pension payments to retirees who worked not for YRC but for other companies that have since gone out of business and are no longer contributing to the multi-employer plan, according to a person familiar with the situation.

Mr. Zollars declined to comment on YRC's specific strategy in seeking the funds, other than to say the company shouldn't be forced to pay the pension benefits of employees who never worked for YRC.

"We're making really good progress on our financial-recovery plan and we think this is an extra burden we shouldn't have to be carrying," he said, adding that applying for the TARP funds is a "way to get the dialogue started about the pension issue."

Hoffa: Senate should reject death sentence for GM

What's ailing the auto industry in the United States is the same as what's ailing the industry in China, Japan, Europe and South America.

Carmakers around the world are struggling through the worst slump in 40 years. Sales of cars by Toyota and Honda fell more during the last year than did sales of cars by Ford.

For America's Big Three automakers, the bad news turned catastrophic last month. In November, 236,000 North American-made cars were sold. That is a shocking 40 percent drop from the number of cars sold in November 2007. No industry can afford a 40 percent sales decline.

Sure, mistakes were made. But the Big Three's dire straits are a result of frozen credit markets and a global recession.

Fortunately, many in Congress recognize that it's crucial to rescue the U.S. auto industry. The House has approved a bill negotiated with the White House that would use existing money for a short-term loan and restructuring of the troubled carmakers.

There are 1.59 million people employed by the Big Three, their parts suppliers and dealerships. As many as 5 million people depend on the auto industry for work, including Teamsters who haul cars, parts and supplies. Letting the domestic auto industry collapse would dramatically worsen a recession that's already a year old.

It would be disastrous to allow even one of the Big Three to seek bankruptcy protection. That would cause the failure of hundreds of auto parts companies and dealerships. The remaining Big Two automakers, dependent on the parts and dealer networks, would go under. Securitized auto loans and their insurers would fail, whipsawing fragile credit markets.

Another consideration: General Motors couldn't get financing for a Chapter 11 bankruptcy. So do the math. Bankruptcy for one automaker means GM closes its doors. For good.

There are some free-market wing nuts who are fine with that. We've all heard their arguments: "Since the automakers brought their problems on themselves, let them fail." Or, "Don't interfere with the free market."

But they ignore a lesson of the last century: America's peace and prosperity depend on a robust manufacturing base.

We would have lost World War II if we didn't have an auto industry that could produce weapons during the war. That's why Franklin Roosevelt called Detroit the "Arsenal of Democracy."

We would not have enjoyed record prosperity during the post-World War II era without a strong manufacturing base -- and productivity gains that were shared with workers.

In recent decades, we've taken our eye off the ball. Instead of shoring up our manufacturing base, we've favored the interests of Wall Street over other sectors of the economy. Nowhere is that more evident than in the ongoing, multitrillion-dollar bailout of irresponsible financial services companies. (By the way, I don't hear anyone complaining that the unions brought down Lehman Brothers.)

Now, Wall Street's follies are hurting the auto industry.

For those who would pull the plug on our domestic automakers, I ask them to consider that our economic competitors won't let their auto industries vanish.

The European Commission is offering $6.3 billion in industry loans for developing greener cars. The Swedish government said it's prepared to help out its automakers. Japan already subsidizes its auto industry by keeping the yen artificially low.

China's automakers, which are owned or controlled by the government, get research grants and loans from state-owned banks. They're asking the government for emergency help in the form of tax relief, lower gas prices and grants.

I hope Congress will take to heart Franklin Roosevelt's words: "The strength of this nation shall not be diluted by the failure of the government to protect the economic well-being of its citizens."